DRAFT Epistemic Closure in Context
نویسندگان
چکیده
1. Epistemic closure The general principle of epistemic closure stipulates that epistemic properties are transmissible through logical means. The principle of epistemic closure under known entailment (ECKE), a particular instance of epistemic closure (EC), has received a good deal of attention since the last thirty years or so. ECKE states that: if one knows that p, and she knows that p entails q, then she knows that q. It is generally accepted that ECKE constitutes an important piece of the skeptical argument, but the acceptance of an unrestricted version of ECKE is still a matter of debate. I agree with Richard Feldman when he writes that “an unrestricted closure principle is false” (1995, 487). The question remains: under what conditions does EC apply?
منابع مشابه
An Open and Shut Case: Epistemic Closure in the Manifest Image*
The epistemic closure principle says that knowledge is closed under known entailment. The closure principle is deeply implicated in numerous core debates in contemporary epistemo logy. Closure’s opponents claim that there are good theoretical reasons to abandon it. Closure’s proponents claim that it is a defining feature of ordinary thought and talk and, thus, abandoning it is radically revisio...
متن کاملEpistemic Logic, Relevant Alternatives, and the Dynamics of Context
Abstract. According to the Relevant Alternatives (RA) Theory of knowledge, knowing that something is the case involves ruling out (only) the relevant alternatives. The conception of knowledge in epistemic logic also involves the elimination of possibilities, but without an explicit distinction, among the possibilities consistent with an agent’s information, between those relevant possibilities ...
متن کاملErratum to: Epistemic Closure and Epistemic Logic I: Relevant Alternatives and Subjunctivism
Epistemic closure has been a central issue in epistemology over the last forty years. According to versions of the relevant alternatives and subjunctivist theories of knowledge, epistemic closure can fail: an agent who knows some propositions can fail to know a logical consequence of those propositions, even if the agent explicitly believes the consequence (having “competently deduced” it from ...
متن کاملWhy Do We Need Justification Logic?
In this paper, we will sketch the basic system of Justification Logic, which is a general logical framework for reasoning about epistemic justification. Justification Logic renders a new, evidence-based foundation for epistemic logic. As a case study, we compare formalizations of the Kripke ‘Red Barn’ scenario in modal epistemic logic and Justification Logic and show here that the latter provid...
متن کاملEpistemic closure, assumptions and topics of inquiry
According to the principle of epistemic closure, knowledge is closed under known implication. The principle is intuitive but it is problematic in some cases. Suppose you know you have hands and you know that ‘I have hands’ implies ‘I am not a brain-in-a-vat’. Does it follow that you know you are not a brain-in-a-vat? It seems not; it should not be so easy to refute skepticism. In this and simil...
متن کامل